Bag of Holding

[Mele]

You cannot relayer items.

5 bags = 3 bags on the 3 layers of your belt. One on arms. One on body.

16 weapons easily fit in those.

[Parsley]

Again, I think that bags of holding supported by the creation of a new item flag ( perhaps FLAG_HOLDING ? ) would improve significantly the playing experience of many, particularly of rogues and to a lesser extent of wizards.

[Algon]

Again, I think that bags of holding supported by the creation of a new item flag ( perhaps FLAG_HOLDING ? ) would improve significantly the playing experience of many, particularly of rogues and to a lesser extent of wizards.

Code wise, bags are limited by the weight they can carry. Example...say a normal travelers pack can hold 50 lbs worth of stuff, while a special dragonscale bag can hold 120 lbs worth of stuff. (Just making these numbers up)

So in reality a new flag would not need to be created when a bag could just be made to hold say 400 lbs worth of things. Most people could not carry around a bag full of that much stuff anyway. Not casting a vote for this, just saying that it could be done without a new flag having to be made.

[Algon]

Again, I think that bags of holding supported by the creation of a new item flag ( perhaps FLAG_HOLDING ? ) would improve significantly the playing experience of many, particularly of rogues and to a lesser extent of wizards.

Code wise, bags are limited by the weight they can carry. Example...say a normal travelers pack can hold 50 lbs worth of stuff, while a special dragonscale bag can hold 120 lbs worth of stuff. (Just making these numbers up)

So in reality a new flag would not be need to be created, when a bag could just be made to hold say 400 lbs worth of things. Most people could not carry around a bag full of that much stuff anyway. Not casting a vote for this, just saying that it could be done without a new flag having to be made.

[Gwain]

infinite bags are possible in game but as far as I know, there is no way to make them not weigh as much as the contents. Not to mention, and this is a big limitation, bags will bug out after a certain amount of items are added, meaning you won't be able to see everything inside, in one coherent line, rather it will be disjointed from the overwhelming amount of text.

[Korwin]

Perhaps a better idea would be bags that they themselves have no weight, this would shave off one or 2 lbs.

[Parsley]

That would help but with 14 STR you still have to do a lot of micro-managing to stay within a light load.

[Yemin]

I've never managed a light load with my wizard, his spell components just weigh too much even with keeping most at 3 or 5

Maybe we should just make components weightless? That'd be nice .

[Ungtar]

Just tested the weight of mine. I'm missing a ton of components and I'm not very high level yet, but my spellpouch weighs about 17 pounds.

I only weigh 37 pounds total!