sickle = scimitar
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:52 pm
While testing for this: viewtopic.php?f=77&t=15501
I discovered something odd. Object VNUM 8501, 'a silver sickle', is actually type 'scimitar'. The name of this object even includes 'scimitar', but it also includes 'sickle'.
I found a similar report here: viewtopic.php?f=148&t=12993
I don't know of these two are related but it's not the only case of this, either.
Object VNUM 22250, 'a blackened sickle', is also type 'scimitar'.
Object VNUM 8479, 'a Kriegsmesser', is type 'scimitar'. (Note: This one may not be a bug, per se. However, it's worth nothing that Kriegsmesser generally share more similarities with, say, a falchion than a scimitar.)
The following scythes are all correctly typed as 'scythe', but for some reason include 'scimitar' in their name:
Object VNUM 11934
Object VNUM 11738
Object VNUM 11535
Cheers,
-Althasizor
I discovered something odd. Object VNUM 8501, 'a silver sickle', is actually type 'scimitar'. The name of this object even includes 'scimitar', but it also includes 'sickle'.
I found a similar report here: viewtopic.php?f=148&t=12993
I don't know of these two are related but it's not the only case of this, either.
Object VNUM 22250, 'a blackened sickle', is also type 'scimitar'.
Object VNUM 8479, 'a Kriegsmesser', is type 'scimitar'. (Note: This one may not be a bug, per se. However, it's worth nothing that Kriegsmesser generally share more similarities with, say, a falchion than a scimitar.)
The following scythes are all correctly typed as 'scythe', but for some reason include 'scimitar' in their name:
Object VNUM 11934
Object VNUM 11738
Object VNUM 11535
Cheers,
-Althasizor