Final thoughts.

Locked
User avatar
Alexan
Sword Journeyman
Sword Journeyman
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Karse

Final thoughts.

Post by Alexan » Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:56 am

As it (most likely) comes to Alexan's final days before moving on in the adventuring world of Forgotten Kingdoms, I figured I would share some thoughts and feelings on my experience in the realms, and (hopefully) can offer some small wisdom.

First, I would like it noted that I will make every possible attempt to follow Lathander's post on "Posting", and rather than deleting this topic, I ask any staff member to edit, remove, or ask me to edit or remove any part they feel do not follow. As it says in the post, we are encouraged to speak our mind as long as we do not curse or speak for others, and I will try not to reveal any information that may be used in an IC fashion such as trainer or item locations, quest specifics, etc.

Here is the link to the guidelines: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=8355

As to this being a complaint, it is not, and I have already contacted someone in that matter, so this will be subjective opinions (mostly) from here on out.



As it may or not be a secret, Alexan was hoping to become a Garlain. I spent weeks RPing the issue, I had inquired, spoken with the faithful, researched, and prayed. I never brought the issue up to immortals OOCly due to looking into the applications post and it says specifically not to put in an app for a coded deity. So I continued on without being challenged or informed (in fact I received praise and was told to continue on the path) by any immortal, member of the Player Council, or anyone with the knowledge to tell me this kind of application would be outright denied. I especially point out immortal in this context due to the fact I prayed (and often as it suggests as a newer player should in the helpfile), so it was documented that I had expressed interest.

I finally found a post in a forum two days ago where it listed certain races that could play outside their pantheon, and any other should apply. While not outrightly explicit, I figured there was at least a possibility of my entering the faith by that post, and since I was not told by anyone, in character or out of character, that I would be denied outright, and in fact was encouraged to, I sent in an application. I cannot say the exact time, I did not record it, but I do remember going to sleep after and getting a response when I woke up.

I was denied. Worst of all, I was denied due to a rule that contradicted itself.

As that post goes, the immortal states a few deities who accept outside their race. Now, this is going by official lore, meaning what is in the helpfiles, and what the helpfiles state as official sources. The deities the immortal lists (which I exclude Mielikki in the list, as ingame lore changes how that was decided), make no connection to the deities. On a point by point basis:
  • Gond is not praised by gnomes, in any major fashion by the official sources. It is said in the official sources during the Time of Troubles, he was a gnome avatar, and helped to create the Faerun version of blackpowder on a tiny secluded island. While you may say that is enough, and that it could have disseminated from there, a complication arises. One, it is never explicitly stated in any source he had moved his following onto gnomekind. Two, where this complication is probably arises most is that Gond is actually on the gnomish pantheon: as a deity known as Nebelun the Meddler, who is actually praised and celebrated in a different way than humans do. Oh, and Garl and Gond are not allies, unless you count Gond's actual stance as Nebelun in the gnomish pantheon.
  • I was told in my decline of application that the exceptions are rare ones, such as half-elves raised exclusively by Elves that could praise the Seldarine. I found this funny considering this same logic is not used at all in making Chauntea a list for Elves. The only deity of the Seldarine Chauntea considers an ally according to official game lore is Mielikki, and that is only using the qualifier made in the game. One may argue this was to increase the choices Elves have when making a Druid, but then why was the Seldarine deity Rillifane Rallathil overlooked? Why would an Elf, who starts with a hundred years of Seldarine faith, immediately abandon that for a human deity that, even in her extended portfolio, explains "plants cultivated by humans", and agriculture?
  • An easy one, Yondalla is not even Tymora's ally in any of the official sources. Being considered the Mother of Halflings, it seems incredibly odd she would allow Halflings to follow another that she does not even count to be an ally.
On the other hand, one can tell not only from his ally list, but from his helpfile that Garl is well known to take allies from other racial pantheons, and in fact makes it a point, being allies of Moradin, Corellon Larethian, Yondalla, Tymora, and others.

While one may say this is not enough of a qualifier to accept a human, I point to this tidbit in the official sources:
... the Temple of Wisdom, called the Shrine of the Short by some humans, is one of the few gnome temples that regularly admits human supplicants, having even won a few converts among them, and it is thus the most widely known temple of Garl outside the insular communities of the Forgotten Folk...

Now I want to make this abundantly clear from this point out: this is not a revenge post for being declined. I'm not mad I was declined, and I can see the OOC reason, even though the rule was already contradicted by the rule maker in her exceptions. I am mad on how the whole process was handled.
  • The decision took less than eight hours. While this would not be a hard decision, it raises alarming questions.
  • Alexan prayed, and often, to Garl, making his intent to clear join.
  • Alexan received kismet based on his RP concerning his path to Garl, and was given a thumbs up by many of Garl's faithful.
  • Alexan (considering that post was made in a topic far down the line, meaning I had no prior knowledge of the exact rule) inquired to Garl from day one, expecting that while there was no Faith Manager, an NPC would eventually make themselves known, and never hid the fact to anyone.
The question raised here is: now that weeks of RP now have been wasted on a flat denial that took less than a day to decide upon, why did it get so far? Why was something not said in the beginning, an OOC tell saying it would not happen, or an NPC saying so? It should have been clear from this point Alexan's stance on the faith, so why not cultivate the RP by letting him know in a healthy manner, or at least nip it in the bud.

Maybe the immortal wanted the character to RP how they wanted, and that they did not want to shut down current RP.

A noble thought, but then why after the decision was declined, and the immortal removing the Inquirer stance when Alexan was online, why was no attempt at exit RP made? Meaning, while I know OOC I cannot be a part of that faith, Alexan is a persistent person, who would not give up easily. And even if he did, what choice do I have? Do I take a heavy decision like faith and shrug it off? He had to do that once after he felt disgusted with the Highcoin of Waukeen he met, should he feel any better about having to do it again? Or should he just grow bitter from never getting a straight answer from any Glitterbright, or no response from Garl? Well, that certainly seems negative.

This immortal did say something that resonated with me OOCly though, mainly: Faith is a privilege, not a right.

But then who is getting the privileges? Now I cannot say for certain this immortal's roleplay, I do know this immortal currently also holds two different positions as Faith Manager, and has held others as well. Two questions arise from this: Why would a staff member of faith, who controls all the faiths anyway, need to be so heavily invested as to have not one, but two characters be faith managers? Moreover, this is not something I have direct knowledge on, but who approved the nominations, not just the current ones but the past ones? Was it the immortal who actually is the approving authority? And if so, isn't that a MAJOR conflict of interest to us players?

Once again, I am not mad about being declined. I felt as though I RPed heavily, going so far as regular prayers and celebrations of Holy Days and living by the Dogma set out. If that was not enough, or if that rule was in place, then why was more not done to stop the beginning RP, or to end it amicably in a in character way, as it should be on a roleplaying server? As far as Alexan knows, from what he was told by the other faithful of Garl, the only major contacts he had with the faith, he still has more of a chance.

I do want to make it clear, if I leave, which seems a plausible idea at this point, it will be due to how this process and RP was handled, and how it was jarred OOC.
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
User avatar
Harroghty
Staff
Staff
Posts: 9695
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:38 pm

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Harroghty » Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:26 am

If any player has a dispute with a decision made by the staff then they should pursue it via the Complaints Reporting forum and allow the staff to discuss the issue and mediate the disagreement. Posts like this do not speed a solution. In fact, they complicate one by making the issue personal. No one is going to delete them, but airing your grievances in this fashion only exacerbates the situation typically.
"A man may die yet still endure if his work enters the greater work, for time is carried upon a current of forgotten deeds, and events of great moment are but the culmination of a single carefully placed thought." - Chime of Eons
User avatar
Kaaurk
Sword Master
Sword Master
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Kaaurk » Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:03 pm

Honestly I can't say that I would be surprised by having this RP application denied. There was nothing stopping you from RPing the fact that Alexan had a change of heart in this regard. By complaining this way it shows that not only are you extremely resentful about it but you also have no respect for the staff (especially this one person) who are just following the guidelines already set up. It's extremely childish grow a thicker skin and RP it out.
User avatar
Alexan
Sword Journeyman
Sword Journeyman
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Karse

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Alexan » Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:13 pm

Kaaurk wrote:Honestly I can't say that I would be surprised by having this RP application denied. There was nothing stopping you from RPing the fact that Alexan had a change of heart in this regard. By complaining this way it shows that not only are you extremely resentful about it but you also have no respect for the staff (especially this one person) who are just following the guidelines already set up. It's extremely childish grow a thicker skin and RP it out.
I still don't see why I should have to RP my character changing his mind when it's just as easy to do something incredibly easy IC to fix this, and there was time and opportunity to do so. I have plenty respect for the staff, and in certain respects understand the decision, but I do not respect the consideration put into the decision before or after.

You can call me childish if you wish, but that does not change the actions taken.

EDIT: I invite any person who feels anything I said was untrue or if I disrespected them to come speak to me personally on the matter. As Harroghty said, this post was best left for complaints, so I'm sorry for airing dirty laundry here, but I am not apologetic for what I have said.
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
User avatar
Algon
Sword Grand Master
Sword Grand Master
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 12:44 am
Location: Waterdeep

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Algon » Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:29 pm

First off...why should the rules of the game be changed just because you feel that you deserve special treatment? I can decide I want to RP having a Dwarf follow Corellon, but just because that's what I want does not mean that the staff should change all the rules....the ones that have been in place for a long time...for someone who thinks this would be a good idea and lots of fun....no matter how many Elves may have rewarded me for making such a choice.

The staff spends countless *unpaid* hours here trying to make the game more enjoyable for all, and I personally think they do not get anywhere near the recognition they deserve for all that they do. So there is no reason to cause a fuss over something as small as a denied application...I have had several applications denied. But you know what? I pulled up my big boy pants and went about my way, figuring that the staff probably knows a little better than I do about why some things should not be allowed to happen.
Counting bodies like sheep...to the rhythm of the war drums. ~~~ Maynard
User avatar
Alexan
Sword Journeyman
Sword Journeyman
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Karse

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Alexan » Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:40 pm

Actually as I learned it says right here:

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12788

That there are exceptions and you can app for something to that effect. Once again, I'm not mad I was denied, only to the consideration of the decision. And while they may move in mysterious ways, some transparency on this issue might help, whether it's public or private. I have pulled up my big boy pants, and have in fact kept moving on for the time being. And the staff does put in unpaid hours, so if we think I'm against the staff here:

I do thank the entire staff for everything they have done in making Forgotten Kingdoms a great server.

Now, I won't be responding to the thread again, considering the issue keeps getting loaded down in pettifog. Should anyone have the need to feel to respond to me directly, feel free to PM me. Should you wish to put your thoughts in the post, feel free, but I will not be responding to it here.
I put on my robe and wizard hat.
Selveem
Sword Grand Master
Sword Grand Master
Posts: 2541
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:38 am

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Selveem » Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:06 am

I feel there's a lot of willful blindness that goes on with regards to the faith system from a lot of us older players. Personally, I've found the system rather frustrating and, sometimes, utterly daunting. Especially, perhaps, because I don't like cookie cutter characters.

That's not to say that I feel the Immortals are utterly negligent or maliciously ignoring candidates, but that there are so many people to deal with (and not just for faith issues), that it's easily overlooked. I have one that Harroghty himself was working on faithing for me before I got annoyed with the character and stopped playing him for a bit (my apologies, Harroghty!). I have other characters who were seeking entry to their faith for years - one still is, actually, but I just don't play him very much anymore.

Now, I understand a few of the responses here: "suck it up; seek another path." But I don't think that's a great attitude to take. Faiths should be inclusive, not exclusive (with very rare exceptions. perhaps). We should want people joining faiths and committing their souls to a specific deity. The Gods would want that, too, as that's how they obtain their power. ICly, there's no good reason an individual wouldn't readily be admitted into most churches. OOCly, I don't think there's a good reason either as it allows for greater character immersion and more player interaction. Win-win!

I understand the suspension of disbelief with regards to the mechanics. I also understand the attempt to maintain the status quo. What I do take issue with is that there often seems to be a belief that our system is as it is because it's the best compromise or the right solution for the game. Maybe there's some merit to that, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be challenged from time to time with thoughts on better solutions or fresh ideas. I think automatic faithing for most churches is a viable solution. Sure, nearly anyone can get in, but that doesn't mean you'll be able to stay in the church of Chauntea after you're caught handing out fertility suppressants (and be prepared for a world of hurt, too).

Alexan, I don't think I'm the only one who appreciates your attempt to give constructive feedback towards a game we all love enough to have devoted thousands of hours each. I also believe that you didn't write this post with the intent of causing problems for anyone or to administer a slap on the sly. I appreciated the read and felt you did a great job of explaining your circumstance and the issues that arose from some broken communication. Surely we will never have a perfect game (there is no such thing, aside from River City Ransom), but we can all entertain ideal solutions.

Rather than shut yourself off from this (or worse), I think it would be a fine time to comb through some of our old threads with issues regarding Faiths in FK and see what we've yet to improve upon and come up with some constructive solutions that might be a fair compromise for everyone involved. I would gladly take part in any such thread and hope others might as well.

I've never played with you, but that doesn't mean I don't hope to play with you (and all the players I currently miss) in the near future. Thank you for caring enough to even type this out. Truly, I think it shows you care a great deal about the game and its inhabitants.
This land shall come to the God who knows the answer to War. -Ninety-Nine Nights
User avatar
Harroghty
Staff
Staff
Posts: 9695
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:38 pm

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Harroghty » Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:34 am

No.

I am going to lock this thread because this was not some impassioned plea for help in the face of a byzantine and oppressive faith system: it was an inappropriate and personal critique of one staff member in particular when the plaintiff had already submitted a complaint directly to Mask. The point of my original response was to request more common courtesy and trust that we will mediate a satisfactory solution to a complaint. If we do not do this then by all means post about it or do whatever else, but let us handle the issue before you start the alarm because by making these sorts of issues public and personal one tends to inflame the emotions of all parties involved and only make the situation more difficult. The staff member in question was the not the problem; the problem was a policy that was not communicated clearly enough, early enough.

The staff is actively discussing how to clarify that policy and how to notify players. I will post a thorough explanation and notice in the near future. Trust that I will cite page numbers from my sources, but remember that at the end of the day some of those decisions may have larger reasons; I will try to explain those also.
"A man may die yet still endure if his work enters the greater work, for time is carried upon a current of forgotten deeds, and events of great moment are but the culmination of a single carefully placed thought." - Chime of Eons
User avatar
Harroghty
Staff
Staff
Posts: 9695
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:38 pm

Re: Final thoughts.

Post by Harroghty » Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:39 pm

I have begun to resolve issues like this by adding additional information to each faith help file. One of the new categories is Wor. Race (Worshiper Races) which lists the allowed races. Sure, there is still room for applications here, but this should give every player the starting guidelines and reduce confusion.
"A man may die yet still endure if his work enters the greater work, for time is carried upon a current of forgotten deeds, and events of great moment are but the culmination of a single carefully placed thought." - Chime of Eons
Locked