Although anyone prepared to lie about something of that magnitude invites an awful lot of trouble, and would no-doubt be called out on it with hillarious consequences.
It's all relative, but I'd say simply concocting a position (Commander, Baron, King etc) out of the blue and strapping into your in-game title is a bit much. Lesser titles you could probably get away with lying about (Remember that you would need to apply if you -really- wanted one of those titles in your background before you make your character ), but only if it were a commonly held belief among others.
Personally though I'd prefer to see the who list reflect the truth for the most part. If you have no title and no occupation, or if you'd like to disguise your title then simply having a surname would do nicely.
Titles
Like having a bugbear fighter from Skullport using the title Archmage of Tantra's. That would be frowned upon I'm sure. I know, this is stretching it a lot, but the point is better to be truthful.
Windows 95: n.
32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
-
- Sword Grand Master
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:51 pm
- Location: Ardeep Forest
- Contact:
A bugbear fighter from Skullport using the title Archmage of Tantras would likely cause a bunch of angry Tantrans to rise up, chase him down, and skin him alive. All reasonable roleplay, if there's justification behind it, I'd say
Dear Enemy: May the Lord hate you and all your kind, may you be turned orange in hue, and may your head fall off at an awkward moment.