Thanks for these last modifications, in my opinion they have added a whole new dimension to FK with much more deep.

These spells would be a great addition to the game

Unlike in d&d in FK different types of attack bonus doesn't stack. Allowing it would reward parties with more diversity in the classes that they make it.

Vote, vote, vote!

This feat might make relying in light armor in opposition to heavy armor more of an option and also users of heavier armor could benefit of it as well.

I don't know if they are already present in FK, but I would like to see aligned weapons and perhaps added to the random reward weapon list. Good/Evil/Axiomatic/Anarchic weapons that can only be hold by characters that have that alignment trait (*) and do 2D6 damage to enemies of opposing alignment t...

Yup, the idea behind this feat is that for those creatures without weak spots you are able to penetrarte their defenses and find something similar to a weak spot but without being it entirely (thus making half-stab damage not full)

I don't know the numbers either but in D&D a rogue's stab at level 20 would cause up to 10D6, it would be entirely different if in FK rogue's stab is watered-down in which case it would not be a worth (neither the feat or the ability).

With this feat trained thieves would be able to backstab / circle-stab creatures he isn't able (golems, undead... ) but he does it at half the damage that would do if his opponent was a creature normally affected by sneak-attack.

+1 to will saves.

Also your attacks are more likely to disrupt enemy spellcasting (be either divine or arcane). Perhaps codewise this could be implemented as if for the purpose for concentration checks your attacks do 4-5 points more of damage.

I was wondering, and hoping for a confirmation. Is the use of the poison spell or poisoned weapons evil? My opinion is that is not evil although it is dishonorable. My reasons behind this thought is that the poison spell doesn't have the evil descriptor and that in the D&D PHB it doesn't list an...

And that is the point, you can save feats and stats points to be able to dual-wield at early/mid-levels or doing at later levels or not doing at all, the way is now you are sort of forced to take that decision.

Thanks for your reply Lathander.

Now that doesn't exist a kismet requirement for creating an evil character. Might it be lifted as well for creating a rogue? Argueably a *bad* evil character could be as damaging as a character of any alignment who steals wantonly. Also perhaps it could open new venues and more character diversity.

I think that the problem here is that disarming is "free" in which you don't have to decide if either attack or disarm, much as a cleric healing himself in a battle is "free" since they don't have to decide to either heal or attack. If FK took a a closer turn to D&D combat sy...

Dual-wield is something that D&D characters can do since level 1 with different degree of success related to how many two-weapon fighting feats the character has, which have very high requirements. For this I propose lowering it somewhere around level 10-20.

I would also add tumble http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/tumble.htm as a warrior/rogue skill that would be sort of an inverted "rescue", the effect would be that in any case your enemies attack you instead the designated member of your party. Success/Failure would indicate if you manage to...